Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160756 (ALL)

VIKAS KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

NABAIL/1136/2025 · 2025-08-29

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1136 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. – 177/2025, Under Sections – 333, 65(2), 351(3) BNS and Sections 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station – Purkha, District – Unnao. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Shri Ram Mohan Mishra, learned Advocate who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant which is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the complainant contends that the anticipatory bail application is not maintainable in respect of the offence under Section 65(2) BNS, in view of the statutory bar contained in Section 482 BNSS. 4. Upon perusal of the record, and considering the statutory bar under Section 482(2) BNS, since the present anticipatory bail application has been filed in connection with an offence under Section 65(2) BNS along with other offences, the same is held to be not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. August 29, 2025 R.C. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mamta Raj, Deepak Rawat, Vishal Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ram Mohan Mishra (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Vikas Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench