Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160752 (ALL)

RAM PYARA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WPIL/885/2025 · 2025-08-29

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 885 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Mohan Singh who appears for the respondent no.4 as well as learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner as a PIL with the following relief : "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 and 3 to directing the opposite parties to restrain the private opposite party no. 5 for encroaching over government land bearing gata no. 542kha/1.2450 hect., situated at Village-Chilbili, Pargana Amethi, Tehsil-Gauriganj, District- Amethi is registered in the name of category 6(2) Abadi, and also initiate enquiry against the guilty person in accordance with law." 3. The documents on record reveal that the proceedings were initiated under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, however, the benefit of section 67-A was granted to the occupants. 4. There being no challenge to the said order, the prayer in the writ petition cannot be granted. 5. The petition is dismissed. August 29, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anmol Kumar Verma, Ankit Kumar Trivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Ram Pyara .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench