HARI OM SAINI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS
HABC/146/2025 · 2025-03-19
Nand Prabha Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16074 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16074 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41215 Court No. - 81 Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 146 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hari Om Saini And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Singh,Shaikh Mohd Mujib Ur Rahman,Varun Shukla,Yateesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J. Sri Mir Sayed and Sri Abdul Saleem Ahamad, Advocates have filed their vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 4 and 5, is taken on record. Heard Sri Neeraj Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Mir Sayed, learned counsel for respondent nos.4 and 5, learned A.G.A. for the State- respondents and perused the record. Pursuant to the order dated 20.02.2025, the corpus (petitioner no.2- Saba Afrin @ Khushi) has been produced before this Court by Lady Constable Shalu (PNO No.192091002) and Sub Inspector Abdul Hamid (PNO No.900892369), Police Station Nagra, District Ballia. On a query being raised, the corpus (petitioner no.2) admits her relationship with petitioner no.1-Hari Om Saini. However, she denies to go alongwith petitioner no.1. She further states that she has not been illegally detained by the respondent nos.4 and
5. Accordingly, the present petition has no merit and is dismissed. As the corpus (petitioner no.2) has admitted her relationship with the petitioner no.1 and yet denied to go with him, therefore, there is no requirement to pay the legal expense of Rs.25,000/-, which is waived of. Order Date :- 20.3.2025 Radhika Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad