Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160733 (ALL)

RADHEY SHAYAM YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

WPIL/903/2025 · 2025-09-03

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 903 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "1. To issue a writ, order or directions in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 & 4, to take a necessary action against the respondent no. 8 and removed the illegal encroachment from the land Gata No. 274, and also directed the respondent no. 8 not to illegally encroached Upon the Land Gata No. 274 registered in Khalihan/Gram sabha land in Revenue record situated In Village- Singthi, Jhaliyava Bhadar, Police Station- Peeparpur, Tehsil- Amethi, District- Amethi. 2. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 & 4 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 16.07.2025 contained as Annexure No. 9 in this writ petition." The learned Standing Counsel based upon the instructions states that the proceedings have already initiated under Section 67(1) and are pending. The instructions are taken on record. In view of the said instructions, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to conclude the pending proceedings in accordance with law with all expedition after hearing the affected parties. September 3, 2025 Anurag Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Uma Shankar Verma, Ashish Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Radhey Shayam Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench