RISHU KUMAR ALIAS MANDAL ALIAS RISHU KUMAR MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4716/2025 · 2025-06-18
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16073 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16073 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:16122 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4716 of 2025
------ Rishu Kumar @ Mandal @ Rishu Kumar Mandal, Aged about 25 years, Son of Late Mantoo Mandal, Resident of Village Chaprasi Tola, Godda Nagar, P.O. Godda, P.S. Godda (T), District –Godda.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate
: Mr. Praveen Shankar Pd., Advocate
: Mr. Sidharth Sudhanshu, Advocate For the State
: Mr. P.K. Chatterjee, Spl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 18.06.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Godda Town P.S. Case No.68 of 2025 corresponding to NDPS Case No. 03 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 22, 25, 27A/29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale and purchase of brown sugar and the petitioner was arrested along with 1.8 grams of brown sugar which comes under the intermediary quantity. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.04.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 23 of the bail application. It is then submitted that no witness has been examined so far, in the trial. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Godda, in connection with Godda Town P.S. Case No.68 of 2025 corresponding to NDPS Case No. 03 of 2025with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-Gunjan/