HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8444 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Vinay Shanker, learned counsel for opposite parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner with following main prayer(s): "(i) Issue; a writ in the nature of "MANDAMUS" directing the Union Bank of India and others (respondents 1-3) to stop the e-auction sale proceedings dated 29.08.2029, of the mortgaged property. (ii) Issue; a writ in the nature of "MANDAMUS" directing the Union Bank of India and others (respondents 1-3) to Grant time for the petitioner to repay the loan amount of Rs. 26,20,790/- (iii) Issue; a writ of "MANDAMUS" to direct the respondent bank to not dispossess the petitioner and her family from the property. (iv) Issue; a writ of " MANDAMUS " to command the bank to regularize the NPA loan account and allow the continuation of EMI payments" 3. Shri Vinay Shanker, learned counsel for Bank/opposite parties has raised preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this writ petition on the ground of territorial jurisdiction as the impugned notice in this writ petition relates to District Bareilly. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Kapish Srivastava Pooja Rastogee .....Petitioner(s) Managing Director And Ceo U.O.I. At Its Central Office Mumbai And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of territorial jurisdiction alone leaving it open to the petitioner to file fresh before appropriate forum. September 1, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 8444 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench