HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5204 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Ajay Kumar Singh learned counsel has filed his vakalatama on behalf of respondent no.2 which is taken on record. The sole grievance of the petitioner is that the appeal no.835 of 2021 is pending before the respondent no.1 since 2021 and appropriate directions be issued to decide the said appeal within time framed. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also noticing the fact that it has been the case of the petitioner that Bench of the respondent no.1 where an appeal is pending, the Presiding Officer is not there. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition, leaving it open for the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the President of the respondent no.1 who shall consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. September 2, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sameeksha Chadha, Piyush Mani Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Rakesh Singh .....Petitioner(s) National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Delhi And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench