[2025:RJ-JP:19877] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2343/2025 Ramprakash Son Of Shri Bhanwarlal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Gudda, Police Station Vivek Vihar District Jodhpur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Majhar Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 12/05/2025 The present petition is filed assailing the order dated 05.03.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kota, whereby application filed by petitioner seeking production of document i.e. CCTV footage and data pertaining to mobile location was dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that if the above stated application is not allowed, same would frustrate the claim of innocence of the petitioner, thereby prejudicing the case of the petitioner before the concerned Court. Upon perusal of the impugned order dated 05.03.2025, this Court has noted that learned Trial Court has observed that if any prayer is made for production of documents to prove innocence of the accused, same is not permissible at the stage of framing of charge. Further, provisions of Section 91 of CrPC and test of necessity and desirability was also considered by the learned Trial [2025:RJ-JP:19877] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2343/2025] Court. The relevant portion of the impugned order is reproduced herein below:- "vr% ekfQd mDr U;kf;d n`"Vkar ds eqyfte dks dkWy fMVsy eqyfte dh izfrj{kk ls iwoZ ugha nh tk ldrhA blh izdkj ls tks VkWy Iyktk ds lhlhVhoh QqVst ekaxs x, gSa] os Hkh eqyfte dh izfrj{kk ls lEcfU/kr gSaA vr% ekfQd mDr U;kf;d n`"Vkar ds] eqyfte dh izfrj{kk esa izdj.k vHkh ugha vk;k gS] izdj.k vHkh lk{; vfHk;kstu esa gSA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr jkeizdk'k iq= Hkaojyky dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuk Lohdkj fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr ugha gSA" Considering the findings and observations of the learned Trial Court, this Court is of the opinion that no prejudice is caused to the petitioner and petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate applications before the concerned Court at appropriate stage. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /262