APHC010208782019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9257/2019 Between: 1. S.VENKATA RAMA REDDY,, S/O. PAPI REDDY, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O. SEETHARAMAPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GADIVEMULA POLICE STATION, GADIVEMULA KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. PEBBETI YELLA SUBBA REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC PADDY BUSINESS, R/O. ALLAGADDA VILLAGE, GADIVEMULA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 86 2 in interfering with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.5 without following due process of law by disturbing his personal liberty as arbitrary, illegal and violation of article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.1 and 2 not to interfere with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No. 5 without following due process of law in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 & 2 not to interfere with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No. 5 without following due process of law pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9257 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that the Police never summoned the petitioner to the Police Station and their preliminary enquiry reveals that the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is of civil in nature and the police will not interfere in such civil dispute. 3. Recording the submission made by learned Additional Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate for necessary relief in the light of the Judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in M.Subramaniam Vs. S.Janaki and another1. No costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 11.08.2025 PSA 1 2020 (16) SCC 728 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9257 of 2019 Date: 11.08.2025 PSA