RSA-2377- IN THE HIG 110 Bhupinder S Ashok Kuma CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent j whereby suit to Sell dated been decreed 2. issued in the inception, th times, out of adjourned o whereas on 18.03.2025 t counsel for 07.05.2024 a adjourned at -2019 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o nder Singh Versus Kumar and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Pritish Goel, Advocate for Mr. Anupam Sharma, Advocate I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Defendant No. 2/appellant is rrent judgments and decrees rendered suit for possession by way of specif l dated 25.10.2010 filed by plaintiff/ ecreed. The matter pertains to the year in the same. Perusal of the order-sh ion, the present second appeal has b out of which on first date of hearing i. ned on account of non-appearance as on 03 dates of hearing i.e. 2025 the same was adjourned in terms el for the appellant; and on remaining 2024 and 01.09.2025 (last date of he ned at the request of learned counsel fo ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2377-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.04.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA te for vocate for the appellant. is in second appeal against the ndered by both the District Courts specific performance of Agreement intiff/respondents No. 1 and 2 has e year 2019 and notice is yet to be sheet(s) reveal(s) that since the has been listed for hearing for 07 aring i.e. 24.01.2023, the appeal was rance on behalf of the appellant; i.e. 13.09.2023, 12.11.2024 and terms of written request of learned aining 03 dates i.e. on 15.01.2024, of hearing) the present appeal was nsel for the appellant. the urts ent has o be the r 07 was lant; and rned 024, was RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.23 12:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-2377- 3. for an adjou available wh rendered by 4. has exhibite litigation. It Court has be interest of ju casual and c counsel is Court is lef non-prosecu 5. 6. 22.04.2026 rishu -2019 (O&M) -2- Today again, learned proxy co adjournment on the ground that lea ble which is not acceptable. Moreover, ed by both the District Courts against A bare reading of the above f xhibited an utterly casual attitude in It is to be appreciated that very as been expended in affording oppor t of justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. It is clear tha seriously interested in pursuing t is left with no other option excep rosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable xy counsel for the appellant prays hat learned arguing counsel is not reover, there are concurrent findings gainst the appellant. ove facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly ear that neither the appellant nor his uing the present matter. Thus, this except to dismiss the same for any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No rays not ings llant sent the the ly his this for RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.23 12:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.