Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16069 (AP)

ANKALA SRINIVASA RAO v. BANDLA SRINIVASA RAO & THE STATE OF A.P.

CRLRC/274/2010 · 2025-07-09

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010210812010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY. THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 274 OF 2010 Between: Ankala Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Samuel, aged about 38 R/o.Dondapadu Village, Tullur Mandal, Guntur District. years, ...PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED AND 1. Bandia Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Venkateswara Rao R/o.Tullur Village & Mandal, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT aged about 40 years, 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.PC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the Judgment dated 19.01.2010 passed in Crl.A.No.33 of 2009 on the file of the VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC), Guntur in confirming the Judgment dated praying that in the 09.01.2009 passed in C.C.No.12 of 2007 on the file of the Court of the Principal Civil Judge, Mangalagiri and allow the present Revision. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MEDURI VARA PRASADA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : - Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER : / / APHC010210812010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 274/2010 Between: ANKALA SRINIVASA RAO, S/0 SAMUEL, R/0 DONDAPADU VILLAGE, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF A P, S/0 VENKATESWARA RAO, R/0 TULLUR VILLAGE & MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. 1.BANDLA SRINIVASA RAO f 2.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: MEDURI VARA PRASADA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: A direction was given on 25.06.2025 is not complied with. The petitioner and the respondent No.1 are not present. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the already been settled out of Court. Hence, the Criminal Revision may be dismissed as settled out of Court. matter has Case 3. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as settled out of the Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/- M.RAMESH BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC), Guntur, Guntur District. (With records if any) 2. The Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. One CC to Sri Meduri Vara Prasada Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CC’s to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of AP at Amaravati. 6. Three CD Copies BSV TAC HIGH COURT DATED:10/07/2025 ORDER CRLRC NO. 274 OF 2010 DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS SETTLED OUT OF COURT WITHOUT COSTS