Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160688 (ALL)

SHASHI PRATAP GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1114/2025 · 2025-09-01

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1114 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Mayank Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Shikhar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.416 of 2024, under Sections 323, 409, 420, 504, 506 I.P.C. registered at Police Station- Baskhari, District- Ambedkar Nagar. 3. At the outset, the learned counsel for the applicant restricted his prayer for giving him an opportunity to file an application for bail. 4. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail and in case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 1, 2025 S. Shivhare Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mayank Pandey, Akhilesha Nand Pandey, Ravi Kant Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Shashi Pratap Gautam .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench