SMT. MUNARI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY./ ADDL. CHIEF SECY. AYUSH ANUBHAG-I AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/9821/2025 · 2025-09-02
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160679 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160679 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9821 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned for payment of arrears of pension due to her husband, family pension and other outstanding retiral benefits with effect from the date of absorption of her husband on
20.08.1994. Extension of benefit of office orders dated 23.08.2017, 15.01.2021 and 08.09.2022 have also been sought.
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director, Ayurvedic Services, Government of U.P. Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. September 2, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Tauseef Siddiqui, Shiv Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Smt. Munari Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./ Addl. Chief Secy. Ayush Anubhag-I And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench