Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160678 (ALL)

VIJAYKUMAR MALERAM KANAUJIYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/7898/2025 · 2025-08-28

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7898 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. Heard Shri Amit Prakash Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the Opposite Party Nos. 1 to 3 to take immediate action for conducting fair, impartial and speedy investigation in first information report dated 10.07.2025 having Case Crime No. 0177/2025 under section 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333, BNS & 3(1)(da), 3(1) (gha) SC/ST Act at police station - Dostpur, District- Sultanpur as much as earlier. II. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties to transfer the investigation relating to first information report dated 10.07.2025 having Case Crime No. 0177/2025 under section 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333, BNS & 3(1)(da), 3(1)(gha) SC/ST Act at police station Dostpur, District- Sultanpur, to any other agency of police such as Special Investigating Team of Police or by Deputy Superintendent of Police." Learned AGA for the State, on the basis of instructions, submits that the chargesheet has been prepared and forwarded against Vivek Singh son of Hari Ram Singh under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333, BNS and Sections 3(1)(da) and 3(1)(gha) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Thus, this petition has rendered infructuous, which could not be disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of above, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. August 28, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Prakash Sharma, Saurabh Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Vijaykumar Maleram Kanaujiya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench