SATYAM SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/9718/2025 · 2025-09-03
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160670 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160670 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9718 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Mr. H.G.S. Parihar, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.S.K. Verma, learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties.
2. This writ petition has been filed challenging transfer order dated 14.6.2025 as well as the approval granted thereof pertaining to transfer from District Unnao to Sitapur.
3. It has been submitted that impugned order has been passed as a measure of penalty on account of disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner. Learned counsel has also taken a ground that petitioner's son is undergoing medical treatment pertaining to serious disease i.e. Cerebral Palsy in District Kanpur which has not been considered by the opposite parties. It is, therefore, submitted that a direction may be issued to the opposite parties to consider petitioner's posting near District Kanpur in view of medical condition of his son.
4. Learned State counsel has produced written instructions dated 30.8.2025 before this Court, which are taken on record and as per which the disciplinary proceedings ended by order dated 9.6.2025. The instructions, however, do not advert to the aspect of medical condition of petitioner's son.
5. In view thereof, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shrawan Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Satyam Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
representation within three days before the opposite party no. 3- Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow, who shall consider and decide the same sympathetically within ten days from the date of production of a certified copy of this order is submitted before the opposite party no. 3.
6. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition stands disposed of.
7. It is made clear that till decision of petitioner's representation, he shall not be compelled to join at the transfer place. September 3, 2025 AKK WRIA No. 9718 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench