HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7056 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. By means of the instant applicant, the applicant has prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the learned Court below not to insist the applicant/ petitioner to file separate sureties and bonds in each and every case and accept only two sureties and one personal bond in lieu of all cases. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties and bonds in each of cases, in which, he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in eight cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- (i) Case Crime No.236 of 2024, under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120 IPC and Section 66-D IT Act, Police Station Vibhuti Khand, District Lucknow. (ii) Case Crime No.237 of 2024, under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120 IPC and Section 66-D IT Act, Police Station Vibhuti Khand, District Lucknow. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Mishra, Arun Chand Pandey, Ram Bahadur Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A. Nasir Ali Siddiqui .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (iii) Case Crime No.294 of 2024, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 409, 201, 506, 120-B IPC and Section 66-D IT Act, Police Station Sarojani Nagar, District Lucknow. (iv) Case Crime No.315 of 2024, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506, 120-B IPC and Section 66-D IT Act, Police Station Sarojani Nagar, District Lucknow. (v) Case Crime No.316 of 2024, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506, 120-B IPC and Section 66-D IT Act, Police Station Sarojani Nagar, District Lucknow. (vi) Case Crime No.317 of 2024, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506, 120-B IPC and Section 66-D IT Act, Police Station Sarojani Nagar, District Lucknow. (vii) Case Crime No.318 of 2024, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506, 120-B IPC and Section 66-D IT Act, Police Station Sarojani Nagar, District Lucknow. (vii) Case Crime No.319 of 2024, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506, 120-B IPC and Section 66-D IT Act, Police Station Sarojani Nagar, District Lucknow. 4. He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail in aforesaid matters, the applicant is still in jail. Being poor person, he is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit separate personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Referring the aforesaid judgement and order, he submits that the applicant may also be given the benefit of the ratio of the judgement passed in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky A482 No. 7056 of 2025 2 (supra). 6. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed off with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. August 27, 2025 Mohd. Sharif A482 No. 7056 of 2025 3 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench