( 2025:HHC:20685 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No. 332 of 2025. Decided on : 1 st July, 2025. Ashok Wadhwa ...Petitioner. Versus Jag Mohan Sood ....Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent: Nemo. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is under instruction to withdraw the application under Order 7, Rule 11 of the CPC from the records of Rent Petition No. 900223 of 2016 pending on the files of Rent Controller-1, Shimla. 2. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. Accordingly, the application under Order 7, Rule 11 of the CPC in Rent Petition No. 90023 of 2016 pending on the files of Rent Controller-1, Shimla is dismissed as withdrawn. In result, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 1st July, 2025. (jai) …2… ( 2025:HHC:20685 )