Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160639 (ALL)

DEVESH KUMAR AND 3 OTHERS v. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) COURT NO-16 RAEBARELI AND ANOTHER

A227/5592/2025 · 2025-09-17

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5592 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent No.2 is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioners seek expeditious disposal of his Regular Suit No.1144 of 2016 pending before the respondent No.1. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Regular Suit No.1144 of 2016 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. September 17, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Kumar Srivastava, Shivani Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Devesh Kumar And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No-16 Raebareli And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench