HARISHARAN YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY./ADDL. CHIEF SECY. CANE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/9785/2025 · 2025-08-29
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160637 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160637 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9785 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. Heard.
2. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 31.03.2024 from the post of Power Turbine Attendant, the entire amount of gratuity to which he is entitled has not been paid by the respondents.
3. Let the matter pertaining to gratuity be considered by the respondent no. 3 in accordance with law and the relevant rules.
4. Let such consideration be done within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case as set forth by the petitioner.
6. Learned Standing counsel, Sri Brijendra Singh, Advocate as well as Sri J.P.Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sudhanshu Chauhan, Advocate are present on behalf of the contesting respondents. August 29, 2025 Pachhere/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Brijendra Singh, Sudhanshu Chauhan (Abdul Moin,J.) Harisharan Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Cane Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench