Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16061 (AP)

P.M. Varaprasad Reddy @ P.M. Prasad Reddy, v. The District Collector and the District Magistrate

WP/9183/2019 · 2025-08-06

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010209542019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9183/2019 Between: 1. P.M. VARAPRASAD REDDY @ P.M. PRASAD REDDY,, S/O.P.OBUI REDDY AGE 60YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO. 1-4-395- NEAR PASNAPALLI BUSTAND, PULIVENDULA TOWN AND MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KALEEMULLA S Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.9183 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an order or a direction or a writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent in illegally recommending the 1st respondent not to renew the petitioner's Arms License from 1- 5-2018 to 30.04.2021 and the action of 1st respondent in issuing endorsement File No.REV-CSECOAA (REN) /66/2018- SA (C3)- KDPC.0, dated 15/05/2019 rejecting the petitioner's application for renewal of arms license for the period from 1.05.2018 to 30.04.2021 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and to direct the respondents to renew the petitioner's arms license for the period from 1.05.2018 to 30.04.2021and pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri Syed Kaleemulla, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 07.08.2025 Pmk 3 01 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:9183 OF 2019 Date: 07.08.2025 Pmk