AYUSHI PRAKASH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BAL VIKAS SEWA EVAM PUSHTAHAR LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/9961/2025 · 2025-09-02
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160600 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160600 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9961 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties no.1 to 5.
2. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite party no.6 stand dispensed with.
4. Petition has been filed challenging appointment of opposite party no.5, Pushpa Devi, as Anganwadi worker in the center concerned.
5. Learned State counsel has been provided written instructions dated 22.08.2025, a copy of which is taken on record.
6. At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits that inadvertently relevant documents could not be annexed with the writ petition and seeks to withdraw the same with liberty to file afresh.
7. In view thereof, petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to petitioner to file afresh. September 2, 2025 Subodh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ayushi Prakash Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bal Vikas Sewa Evam Pushtahar Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench