Preetam Raj Vs. Poonam Sharma & Anr. CMP(M) No. 1091/2024 24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Verma, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Rishabh Negi, Advocate, for the respondents. CMP(M) No. 1091/2024 For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, we find sufficient cause to condone the delay of 80 days that has crept up in filing the appeal. Ordered accordingly. The application stands disposed of. FAO (FC) ST No. 24760/2024 Appeal be registered. Before the appellant is heard in the matter, let him place on record the details of the amount paid by him to the respondents towards maintenance pursuant to the impugned order. List on 07.04.2025. [ ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 24th March, 2025 (raman)