SMT. NIRMALA v. NAYAB TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL-KUNDA, PRATAPGARH AND ANOTHER
A227/5142/2025 · 2025-09-01
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160599 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160599 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5142 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent no.2 is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Kunda, District Pratapgarh to decide the Mutation Case No.639 of 2015, (Computerized Case No.T2015025701639) "Nirmala Devi vs. Bhagwandeen" under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, which is pending before respondent no.1, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Kunda, District Pratapgarh, considers and decides the aforesaid mutation case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Kunda, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide Mutation Case No.639 of 2015, (Computerized Case No.T2015025701639)
"Nirmala Devi vs. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Pratap Singh, Vishnu Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Nirmala .....Petitioner(s) Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil-Kunda, Pratapgarh And Another .....Respondent(s)
Bhagwandeen" under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 1, 2025 KR A227 No. 5142 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench