Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160597 (MAD)

A.S.Jesudurai v. The Sale Officer

CRP(MD)/2293/2022 · 2025-02-07

Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.2293 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.02.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.2293 of 2022 and C.M.P.(MD) No.10992 of 2022 A.S.Jesudurai ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Sale Officer Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies Office Tiruchendur 2.The Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies Tiruchendur ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil revision petition is filed, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the docket order dated 26.10.2022 and direct the Special Tribunal for Co-operative Cases (Principal District Court), Thoothukudi, to number the C.M.A.(CS) Diary No.6276 of 2022. For Petitioner : Mr.Ka.Ramakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.2293 of 2022 O R D E R This civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved by certain office objections raised by the Court of the learned Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi. 2. As a matter of fact, no civil revision petition can be entertained on the office objections raised by the Court below. But, the petitioner, instead of resubmitting the matter by answering to the office objections, has approached this Court by filing the present civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. In all probabilities, the petitioner ought to have responded to the office objections and in case the learned Principal District Judge fails to consider the same in accordance with law, then it would be appropriate for the petitioner to approach this Court by filing a civil revision petition. 4. However, when the matter is taken up for consideration today, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner has passed away in ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.2293 of 2022 the month of November, 2024 and the learned counsel for the petitioner is yet to get in touch with the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner. 5. In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to keep the matter pending and accordingly, this civil revision petition is closed as having become abated. However, the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner are granted liberty to file appropriate application, in the event if they want to pursue the matter any further. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 07.02.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No krk To: 1.The Principal District Judge, Special Tribunal for Co-operative Cases, Thoothukudi 2.The Sale Officer, Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies Office, Tiruchendur. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.2293 of 2022 3.The Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Tiruchendur. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.2293 of 2022 MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J. krk C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.2293 of 2022 and C.M.P.(MD) No.10992 of 2022 07.02.2025 ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis