SR MGR, MEENAKSHI ENERGY PVT LTD., HYDERABAD v. GANDAVARAPU RADHA KRISHNA REDDY, NELLORE DIST & 6 OTH
WA/5/2014 · 2025-01-27
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, R Raghunandan Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16059 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16059 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT APPEAL NO: 5 OF 2014 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 18.11.2013 in WP No. 32019 of 2010 on the file of the High Court. ^ Between: I Meenakshi Energy Pvt Ltd., Rep. by its Senior Manager, Mr Devineni Venkateshwara Rao, S/o Sri Ch. Kondaiah, Aged about 40 years, R/o H. No.6-3-609/99, 2"'^ Floor, Flat No. 202, Hari Priya Residency, Anand Nagar Colony, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT 6 ^ AND Gandavarapu Radha Krishna Reddy, S/o Daratharami Reddy, Aged about 65 years, R/o Anikepally Village, Venkatachalam Mandal, SPSR Nellore District Kasi Reddy Rajeswaramma, W/o Janardhar Reddy, Hindu, aged about 64 years, Ramallingapuralun, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. ...RESPONDENTS/WRIT PETITIONERS- The Government of A.P., rep. by its Secretary, Industries & Commerce Department, Secretariat buildings, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gudur, SPSR Nellore District. The Tahsildar, Chillakur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., Rep by its Zonal Manager, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District, A.P.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
» A. NO: 1 OF 2014rWAMP. NO: 12 OF 2014)^ Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the common Judgment rendered by this Hon'ble Court in W.P. 32019 of 2oTo dated 18-11-2013 praying that in the circumstances pending disposal of the above writ appeal.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI P HEMACHANDRA _ Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 &2: SRI M. K. RAJ KUMAR - Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6: GP FOR REVENUE ^ Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI P. ROY REDDY The Court made the following: JUDGMENT APIICL
\ APHC010209802014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3508] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT APPEAL NO: 5/2014 Between: Sr Mgr, Meenakshi Energy Pvt Ltd., Hyderabad ...APPELLANT AND Gandavarapu Radha Krishna Reddy Nellore Dist 6 0th and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:
1.P HEMACHANDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR ASSIGNMENT 2.GP FOR REVENUE 3.M KRAJ KUMAR 4.PGANGA RAMI REDDY 5.P ROY REDDY 6.GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE
\ The Court made the following: (perHon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) V
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ appeal does not survive and it has become infructuous. Accordingly, the present Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/-M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Sg6TiWO^ICER To
1. One CC to Sri P. Hemachandra, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to Sri P. Ganga Rami Reddy, Advocate [OPUQ]
3. One CC to Sri P. Roy Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] -
4. One CC to Sri M. K. Raj Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] CCs to GP for Assignment, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUTt
5. Two
6. Two CCs to GP for Industries and Commerce, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
8. Three CD Copies. ssb
HIGH COURT DATED:27/01/2025
JUDGMENT WA.No.5 of 2014 % * 2 5 FFR ?D?5 % Co . Current .jeciion . . 5^SPATC«fe®^ DISMISSING THE W.A. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS