VIJAY SINGH v. STATE OD U.P. THRU. THE CHIEF SECY. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/9768/2025 · 2025-08-28
Manish Mathur
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160571 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160571 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9768 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authorities for regularising the services of petitioner as Driver in the Board of Revenue with all consequential benefits with regard to similarly situated employees in the light of judgement rendered by Supreme Court in the case of Dharam Singh & Ors. vs. State of U.P. & Anr., Civil Appeal No.855 of
2018. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to move fresh representation before opposite party no.4 i.e. Commissioner & Secretary, Board of Revenue, U.P. In case such representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority in the light of aforesaid judgment in case the same is applicable. August 28, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Piyush Asthana, Ujjwal Kirti Bisen Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Vijay Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Od U.P. Thru. The Chief Secy. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench