Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16056 (UTT)

VINAY KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/214/2025 · 2025-03-05

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D- 33 WPSS No. 214 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Harendra Belwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Narain Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State. Dr. S.S. Lingwal, Advocate for the respondent no. 2, through video conferencing. Instant petition has already been decided on05.03.2025. Now, a correction application (MCC No. 2 of 2025) has been filed. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is an error in the father’s name of the petitioner no. 4 and his position, which he had held; therefore, correction may be permitted. It is not objected by the respondents. Correction application is allowed. Let amended memo of parties be filed by the petitioners within a week. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 15.07.2025 Avneet/