SHYAM NARAYAN @ GHANSHYAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY., DEPTT. OF HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/5156/2025 · 2025-09-01
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160551 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160551 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5156 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 to 3.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 3 / Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Tarabganj, District Gonda to decide the recall application filed in Suit No.93/200/2012-2013, (Computerized Case No.T201208300600114)
"Shyam Narayan vs. Gram Sabha and other", which pending before respondent no.3, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 3 / Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Tarabganj, District Gonda, considers and decides the aforesaid recall application in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 3 / Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Tarabganj, District Gonda is directed to decide recall application filed in Suit No.93/200/2012-2013, (Computerized Case No.T201208300600114)
"Shyam Narayan vs. Gram Sabha and other", expeditiously, say within a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Kumar, Rakesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Shyam Narayan @ Ghanshyam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 1, 2025 KR A227 No. 5156 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench