RAM SULOCHAN CHAUHAN @ SULOCHAN v. CIVIL JUDGE COURT NO. 21 SULTANPUR AND 5 OTHERS
A227/5121/2025 · 2025-09-04
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160550 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160550 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5121 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the temporary injunction application dated 20.09.2023 filed in Permanent Injunction Civil Suit No.952 of 2023. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending application for temporary injunction in Regular Suit no.952 of 2023 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. September 4, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhupendra Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Jaspreet Singh,J.) Ram Sulochan Chauhan @ Sulochan .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge Court No. 21 Sultanpur And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench