[2025:RJ-JP:20778] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5312/2025 Lalji Son Of Banesingh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Chokhanda, Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur. ( At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Bayana) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5580/2025 Roopwati W/o Lt. Bhagirath, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Nandigav, Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Bayana) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) For Complainant : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG Mr. Chandra Mohan Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 16/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0089/2025 registered at Police Station-Radawal, District-Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 326(g), 324(4), 324(5), 115(2), 3(5) of BNS. 2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order. [2025:RJ-JP:20778] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5312/2025] 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that the allegation against the petitioner is of causing mischief by fire to complainant's house. The petitioners are behind the Bar since 03.04.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Lalji Son Of Banesingh (2) Roopwati W/o Lt. Bhagirath shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. ( PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/205-206