SACHIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA @ SACHIN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME . LKO.
NABAIL/1135/2025 · 2025-08-29
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160516 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160516 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1135 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Vishal Srivastava, Learned Counsel for the applicant, and Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, Learned Addl. Government Advocate, for the state. 2. The applicant has filed this application seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 083 of 2025 under Sections 318(4), 316(2), BNS, P.S. Mahingwan, District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged on 29/06/2025, stating that the applicant, who belongs to the family of the informant and resides in her neighborhood, has deceitfully withdrawn ₹4,51,000/- from her bank account through RTGS. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case, and he has no criminal history. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the transfer of money was made after the informant herself had signed the requisite documents in the bank. 6. The learned AGA has opposed the anticipatory bail application and submitted that the investigation in the case is still going on. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, including the nature of the allegations, the submission of learned counsel for the applicant, and the fact that the applicant has no previous criminal history, the anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vishal Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sachin Kumar Srivastava @ Sachin Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home . Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
8. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is allowed. 9.
In the event of arrest/appearance of applicant- Sachin Kumar Srivastava @ Sachin Kumar before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court: (i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court' (iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v) that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. August 29, 2025 A.Nigam NABAIL No. 1135 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench