On 22.12.2025, this Court had passed the following order: “Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is a widow, working as a househelp and her name surfaced based on the disclosure statement of co however, there is no allegation against him of having received any amount and Rs.60,000/ by the complainant to co-accused falsely implicated in the case and has no connection with bride-Rajinder Kaur, whose mother she was allegedly shown to be. She has clean antecedents and is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when the investigating agency and wil Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent State and files status report, which is taken on , this Court had passed the following order:- Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is a a househelp and her name surfaced based on the disclosure statement of co-accused, however, there is no allegation against him of having amount and Rs.60,000/- is stated to be paid accused Jitender. She has been falsely implicated in the case and has no connection with Rajinder Kaur, whose mother she was allegedly clean antecedents and is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. At the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Saroha, notice on behalf of respondent- State and files status report, which is taken on record. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.10 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Copy whereof has been handed over to learned counsel opposite. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 04.01.2026. In the event of her arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482 (2) BNSS. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 09.02.2026.” 3. Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, she shall make herself available without demur. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from the Investigating Officer, affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 22.12.2025 granting interim bail to her, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to her. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.10 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.