Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160499 (ALL)

M/S KAPOOR MARKETING THRU. LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE RAJEEV KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. INSTITUTIONAL FINANCE LKO. AND ANOTHER

WTAX/854/2025 · 2025-09-02

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT TAX No. - 854 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This petition has been filed with the following main reliefs: "a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 15/04/2024 (Annexure No.4) passed by the Opp. Party No.2. b) Issue writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 15/04/2024 (Annexure No.4) passed by the Opp. Party No.2 as the same has been passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice without giving mandatory personal hearing to the Petitioner as provided in Section 75(4) of the Act." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn . September 2, 2025 Sachin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) M/S Kapoor Marketing Thru. Legal Representative Rajeev Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Institutional Finance Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench