Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16049 (UTT)

BEENA PHULERA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1151/2023 · 2025-11-04

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:9753 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PSS/ 1 1 5 1 / 2 0 2 3 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Ms. Nikhil Bhatt, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Narayan Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of subsequent development, the relief claimed by the petitioner, do not survive. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 04.11.2025 Navin