RAMESH CHANDRA PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/9808/2025 · 2025-09-02
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160476 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160476 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9808 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned for considering petitioner's case for promotion on post of Head Assistant and consequently to post of Administrative Officer with effect from the date persons junior to him have been provided such benefits.
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.4 i.e. District Magistrate, Sitapur or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. September 2, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Shukla, Pramod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ramesh Chandra Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench