Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160472 (ALL)

FURKAN AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. GOVT. LKO. ANOTHER

A482/7269/2025 · 2025-09-02

Shree Prakash Singh

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7269 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly by pleased to quash the entire criminal proceeding of Criminal Case no.72717/2024, State Vs. Furkan Ahmad, arising out of case crime no. 435/2023, under section 406/506/504 I.P.C, at Police Station-Thakurganj, District-Lucknow along with charge sheet dated-09.09.2023 as well as impugned summoning order dated 16.07.2024 and bailable warrant dated 27.02.2025 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- 5th, Lucknow, as Contained in ANNEXURE No.1 & 2 to this application, or passed an order in the light of the Case "Satendra Kumar Antil" passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court, in SLP (Crl.) Nos. 55191/2021, in the interest of justice." 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shabnam, Vinod Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Furkan Ahmad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko. Another .....Opposite Party(s) before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 2, 2025 Mohd. Sharif A482 No. 7269 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench