Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160459 (ALL)

TANVEER AHMED AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR, UNNAO AND OTHERS

A227/5176/2025 · 2025-09-01

Alok Mathur

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5176 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 &2 and Shri Om Prakash Tiwari, Advocate, who has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.3, which is taken on record. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Sadar, District Unnao to decide the Original Suit No.T202410690107362), "Wakf Alal Aulad Haji Mohammad Sher Khan vs. Shamshad Ahmed and others", which is pending before respondent no.2, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Sadar, District Unnao considers and decides the aforesaid original suit in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Sadar, District Unnao is directed to decide the Original Suit No.T202410690107362), "Wakf Alal Aulad Haji Mohammad Sher Khan Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., O.P. Tiwari Tanveer Ahmed And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Unnao And Others .....Respondent(s) vs. Shamshad Ahmed and others", expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 1, 2025 KR A227 No. 5176 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench