HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9784 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned for payment of second and third A.C.P. to petitioner from the date when it was admissible to petitioner. Consequential service benefits including revised pension has also been sought. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director, Bal Vikas Sewa Evam Pushtahar U.P. , Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. September 2, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Mani Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Sunita Kandpal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bal Vikas Sewa Evam Pushtahar U.P. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench