RAMA SHANKAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/8389/2025 · 2025-09-03
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160433 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160433 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8389 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard the petitioner in person, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State Respondents and Sri Satish Chandra Kashish, Advocate, who has filed power on behalf the respondent no.5.
2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer:-
"Issue writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing/setting aside the impugned
order date 25.07.2025 which was passed by Opposite party no.2 in Arbitrary and cursory manner as contained in Annexure no.1 in the best interest of justice. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite party no.3 and 4 to hold an enquiry and take prompt, fair and appropriate actions in regard to the corruption and financial irregularities by Opposite party no.6 in the interest of justice."
3. We have gone through the order dated 25.07.2025, which has been passed in an Appeal filed by the respondent no.6- Mamta Rastogi against Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivam Kumar Mishra, Jitendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Kirti Mishra, Suresh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Satish Chandra Kashish Rama Shankar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
the order passed by the District Level Committee dated 12.07.2024. The
order of the Divisional Level Committee has been challenged by the petitioner on the ground that it has been passed without application of mind and by remanding the matter to the District Level Committee, the opportunity would be given to the respondent no.6 to continue with financial and other irregularities as her caste certificate was wrongly issued to her.
4. The petitioner has a statutory remedy of filing an Appeal before the State Level Committee.
5. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the liberty as aforesaid. September 3, 2025 Rahul WRIC No. 8389 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench