JITENDRA KUMAR BAJPAI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
CRLP/8043/2025 · 2025-09-03
Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160431 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160431 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8043 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. Heard, Shri Shubham Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. and Shri Kuldeep Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
"a) To, issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the Special Court of Anti- Corruption, C.B.I.(West), Lucknow to consider and decide the claim of the practitioner under Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, in accordance with law, b) To, direct the concerned authorities, including the Enforcement Directorate, to ensure that the claim of the petitioner is duly considered in light of the order dated 09.05.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.3991 of 2025 which is contained as Annexure no.1 to this writ petition. c) To issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice. d) To award the cost of the writ petition." Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to move application under Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 before the concerned court after disposal of the Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Dairy No(s). 5578 of 2025; Asif Naseem Versus Union of India and others by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. To which there is no objection by the other side. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as aforesaid. September 3, 2025 Banswar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prakash Giri, Jagriti Bardhan Rao, Shubham Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Kuldeep Srivastava (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Jitendra Kumar Bajpai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench