2019:HHC:11613 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.305 of 2014 Decided on: 16.09.2025 Arvind Pal Singh … Petitioner Versus Canara Bank & others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : None for respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 ex parte. Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for respondents No.3 and 4. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) When this case was listed on 04.10.2024, the following order was passed:- “Since none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls, therefore, in the interest of justice, list after four weeks.” 2. Today also, as none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls, the petition is dismissed in default, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge September 1 6 , 2025 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?