MOHD. MOINUDDIN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/7177/2025 · 2025-08-29
Ajay Bhanot
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160415 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160415 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7177 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. By the impugned orders dated 28.05.2025 and 29.05.2025, the discharge application filed by the applicants has been rejected by the learned trial court/ learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.1, Sultanpur. Shri Vivek Gupta, learned A.G.A. submits that the learned trial court has found that the applicants were named in the F.I.R. and they also figured in their statements. On the basis of evidences in the record, prima facie offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 34, 120B, 201, 427 IPC and Sections 3/25/5/27 of the Arms Act are made out against the applicants. Faced with this, Shri Dileep Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants submits that they do not wish to press the prayer sought in the application. The prayer sought in the application is accordingly declined. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dileep Kumar Tiwari, Md.Khurshed Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Moinuddin And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Learned counsel for the applicants recasts relief and submits that the applicants may be permitted to invoke appropriate remedies before the court below. It is always open to the applicants to seek the appropriate remedy before the competent court as per law. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of. August 29, 2025 Ashish Tripathi A482 No. 7177 of 2025 2 (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench