Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010155612023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/431/2023 PRODIP KUMAR RAY S/O LT. KHAGENDRA NATH RAY, VILL- DEBOOTAR HASDAHA PT-II, P.O.- KACHARIGHAT, P.S.-DHUBRI, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN - 783334 VERSUS SMTI. SURANJANA SENAPATI DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-19 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M R KHANDAKAR, Advocate for the Respondent : MR S M T CHISTIE, MR. D SAIKIA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO ORDER 28.05.2025 Heard Mr. M.R. Khandakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, learned counsel for the respondent. This contempt petition has been filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of this Court’s Order dated 27.02.2023
Page No.# 2/2 passed in WP(C) No. 5721/2021. Mr. S.M.T. Chistie on the last occasion had submitted the order of this Court had been complied with the passing of the order dated 19.11.2024 by the Director of Elementary Education, Assam. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that the petitioner was not given the opportunity of hearing. In view of such submission, the learned counsel was asked to obtain instructions in this regard. Today, the learned counsel has produced the attendance of the hearing which was conducted on 15.09.2023 in connection with WP(C) No. 5721/2021 wherein the petitioner has clearly appended his signature. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner was present and was also given an opportunity of hearing. Considering the submission made and upon perusal of the attendance produced by Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, it appears that the order of this Court has been complied with. The contempt petition accordingly stands closed. The attendance dated 15.09.2023 is retained in the record and marked as ‘X’ for identification.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant