RAKESH KUMAR AND 7 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/7252/2025 · 2025-09-01
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160399 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160399 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7252 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:-
"WHEREFORE, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned summoning order dated 01/08/2024 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Lucknow in Case Crime No. 22/2024 U/S 147,148,452,323,504, 506, 325 I.P.C Police Station -Sushant Golf City, South Commissionerate Lucknow District Lucknow on the basis of charge sheet filed by investigating officer on dated 15/03/2024 and further quashing the charge sheet dated 15/03/2024 in Case Crime No. 22/2024 U/S 147,148,452, 323, 504, 506, 325 I.P.C Police Station -Sushant Golf City, South Commissionerate Lucknow District Lucknow with its which is consequential effects relates to the applicants, contained as Annexure No. 1 & 2 to this application, in the interest of justice."
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants were not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Munni Lal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rakesh Kumar And 7 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 1, 2025 Mohd.
Sharif A482 No. 7252 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench