HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1121 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Utkarsh Mishra, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Amit Kumar Dwivedi, the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No.04 of 2025, under Sections 3 RP (UP) Act, registered at Police Station RPF, Mankapur, District Gonda. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of a recovery of thirty sacs of wheat belonging to railway from six persons. The applicant has been implicated on the basis of custodial statement of co-accused persons who stated that the applicant was also involved with the persons apprehended. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the anticipatory bail-application it has been contended that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The applicant's involvement in two other criminal cases has been disclosed in para 16 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, in one of which he has been granted bail and in other case he has not received any summon/notice as yet. It has also been submitted on behalf of the applicant that the co-accused Atul Dubey has been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this court by means of an order dated 30.07.2025, passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No.817 of 2025. 5. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that a co-accused has already been granted Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Utkarsh Misra, Abhishek Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Praveen Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) anticipatory bail and without making any observations which may affect the outcome of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant also. 7. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant-Praveen Singh before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court: (i). that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court' (iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v). that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. August 29, 2025 Ram. NABAIL No. 1121 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench