ISHAN MANI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN. SECY. P.W.D. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/9692/2025 · 2025-08-27
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160368 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160368 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9692 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Sri Shishir Jain, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.2 to 4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that earlier the respondents had not considered the promotion of the petitioner to the post of Deputy Project Manager and Project Manager on the ground that the medical leave was not sanctioned. Subsequent thereto, vide order dated 11.12.2024, a copy of which is annexure 4 to the writ petition, the medical leave has now been sanctioned by way of leave without pay and thus, the only impediment in not considering the claim of the petitioner is no longer in existence. It is further contended that various persons junior to the petitioner have been promoted and consequently, there cannot be any occasion for the respondents to not promote the petitioner w.e.f the date his juniors have been promoted on the aforesaid posts. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Rai, Lallan Rai, Prakarsh Pandey, Praveen Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shishir Jain Ishan Mani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. P.W.D. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Sri Shishir Jain, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.2 to 4 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
August 27, 2025 Pachhere/- WRIA No. 9692 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench