Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160325 (ALL)

AKHAND JYOTI PANDEY AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIA/9740/2025 · 2025-08-28

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9740 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Written instructions dated 25.08.2025 filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 3. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:- i.issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the opposite parties to consider the case of the petitioners for regularization on the post of Collection Peon in accordance with the relevant Rules of Uttar Pradesh Collection Peon's Service Rules 2004 and the Uttar Pradesh Collection Peon's Service (Second Amendment) Rules 2016 and Government order No.146/EK-7-2019-N0-7 dated 22.02.2019 as contained in annexure no.1 to 3 to this writ petition, in the interest of justice. 4. Since consideration of petitioners grievance would entail factual aspect, liberty is granted to petitioners to move individual representations before party no.4 i.e. District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar. In case such representations are filed, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon the said authority. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. August 28, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : P.K. Mishra, Vivek Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Akhand Jyoti Pandey And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench