SURESH KUMAR PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. FOREST DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/9728/2025 · 2025-08-28
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160323 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160323 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9728 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1 and Shri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 to 4.
2. With the consent of learned counsels appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being decided.
3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite an order dated 7.1.2025 issued by the respondent corporation, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition, for refund of certain amount as due to the petitioner and others after receipt of undertaking and the undertaking having already been given on 2.5.2025, a copy of which is annexure 2 to the writ petition, respondents have failed to process the refund of the petitioner and hence the writ petition.
4. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to process the refund of the petitioner in terms of order dated 7.1.2025 provided that the formalities as required in terms of the said letter has been fulfilled and there is no legal impediment.
5. Let the payment be processed in accordance with law and relevant rules within six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. August 28, 2025 J. K. Dinkar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Tripathi (Abdul Moin,J.) Suresh Kumar Pathak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench