RANJEET KUMAR @ RAJESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/7725/2025 · 2025-09-18
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160288 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160288 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7725 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to quash the entire proceeding of case No- 2699/2023 State vs Ranjeet and others, U/S- under section- 283/149/341/336 I.P.C read with section 7 CL Act police Station- Fatehpur District Barabanki, Impugned charge sheet no. WSCC 26991/2023 24/9/2023 submitted by investigating officer as well as impugned summoning order dt 17/11/2023 & 15/03/2025 passed by Additional Chief judicial Magistrate Court no-18, Barabanki (contained as Annexure No.1 & 2 to this petition), in the interest of law and justice."
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sapana Verma, Meena Bajpai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ranjeet Kumar @ Rajesh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51.
5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.
6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
7. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 18, 2025 Mohd. Sharif A482 No. 7725 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench