Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160284 (ALL)

ASHWINI KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/8423/2025 · 2025-09-01

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8423 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the material available on record. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that an ex- parte order was passed against him on 13.10.2023, whereby the deficiency of stamp duty was assessed against the said ex-parte order and, thereafter, an application for recall has been moved vide application dated 23.04.2024, which is said to be pending. 3. As, the petitioner has already moved a recall application, the present petition is disposed of directing the respondent no.3 to consider and decide the pending recall application, in accordance with law with all expedition preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. September 1, 2025 Praveen Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vatsaly Srivastava, Manoj Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Ashwini Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench